RE: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-20 Thread Sindre
heh, are you on crack? tulip on 2.4.9 doesn't even work properly without a patch, and in 2.6, the tulip-driver has been split up in like 4 different modules. while 3com just works-every-time, even isa-3coms work flawless as long as you manually set them to use rj45 instead of bnc/coax. 3com 4evah

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-20 Thread Steven Hartland
"Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Just a friendly netiquette reminder :) > >and whatever you do don't put huge ascii art in your .sig Yer espscially ones that dont work as ascii art :P Steve / K ___

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-20 Thread Steven Hartland
"Brian A. Stumm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >80 lines of quote > >Ok I can't argue with that, I'm no sys admin... :) Please trim your posts Brian!! Steve / K ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-20 Thread raoul bhatia
Oscar N wrote: I would be very happy if you could do the same test on the same machine(s) but with freebsd :) /Oscar me too! best regards, raoul bhatia ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-20 Thread Oscar N
I would be very happy if you could do the same test on the same machine(s) but with freebsd :) /Oscar On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:48:24 -0700 "James Couzens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everyone, > > I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some > of you can find it useful.

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Eric (Deacon)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those aren't the 1% for 30 player numbers this whole thread has been going on and on about. Those numbers look believable. 1% for 30 CS players is not. Jeremy, with all due respect, will you STOP fucking talking about "30 CS players"? Has it not yet made it through your h

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Stan Bubrouski
Brian A. Stumm wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, john wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Brian A. Stumm wrote: On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Matt Judge wrote: James Couzens wrote: Everyone, I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some of you can find it useful. Let me preface these r

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Stan Bubrouski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those aren't the 1% for 30 player numbers this whole thread has been going on and on about. Those numbers look believable. 1% for 30 CS players is not. This has been my *1* and only point all along. His numbers here are fine. They are not the ludicrous subteen percentage

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread James Couzens
excluding the unholy cpu use of de_airstrip. James - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 3:25 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ > Tho

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Daniel Stroven
03 6:51 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Brian A. Stumm wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Matt Judge wrote: > > > > > James Couzens wrote: > > > > > > >Everyone

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Matt Judge
Brian A. Stumm wrote: I've been running older kernels on this netfinity dual 133mhz pentium for years at work. It still runs a pre 2.4.10 kernel, we only keep it around for testing purposes but she runs SMP just fine. You guys act as if dual processors is a new thing. I think you will find we are

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread john
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Brian A. Stumm wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Matt Judge wrote: > > > James Couzens wrote: > > > > >Everyone, > > > > > >I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some of > > >you can find it useful. Let me preface these results with the fact that I > >

RE: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread jeremy
Those aren't the 1% for 30 player numbers this whole thread has been going on and on about. Those numbers look believable. 1% for 30 CS players is not. Jeremy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: htt

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread Matt Judge
James Couzens wrote: Everyone, I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some of you can find it useful. Let me preface these results with the fact that I was unable to run 2.4.9 on the SMP machine because it would kernel panic (likely SMP I don't know but I didn't have t

Re: [hlds_linux] Comparing 2.6.0-test4 100HZ, 250HZ, 500HZ, 2.4.20 100HZ and 2.4.9 100HZ

2003-09-19 Thread raoul bhatia
i for my part would like to thank you for your efforts on this issue. as i haven't got that much time to test with different kernels and stuff, i really appreciate your effort. best regards, raoul bhatia James Couzens wrote: Everyone, I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope t