> I always thought of the Deacon as more of a (euphamism
> warning!!!) 'tight-end'?! ;)
Perceptive :)
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mai
w00t!!! ahahahahahaa, nice one :)
/me jots this down in his Deacon_Insults.txt file
"Jay Anstiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:mailman.1036804084.10965.hlds_linux@;list.valvesoftware.com...
| I always thought of the Deacon as more of a (euphamism warning!!!)
| 'tight-end'?! ;)
|
|
I always thought of the Deacon as more of a (euphamism warning!!!)
'tight-end'?! ;)
Jay.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> Stop it, ya goofball, or Leon will kick you off the list for
> spamming (not that Deacon doesn't spam, but at least he usually
> has a position of some kind).
Linebacker, usually :)
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list prefer
I actually nailed a fair amount of people using model hacks using
imagemagic. I found some shots where bright colored shots where being
used and got some color samples and then had a shell script that used
imagemagic to look for these colors in all the shots. It actually
worked pretty well and r
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 12:43, Jules (aka Buddha-Pest) wrote:
> to correctly do screenshots that capture what the client is REALLY seeing is
> very very difficult. PB could only do it on a small subset of video cards.
And even then it was easily defeated.
__
7;d be just awesome.
|
| Joshua
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Tyler "Overkill" Schwend [mailto:tasf@;tds.net]
| Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 12:08 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question
|
|
| Instead of spending so much time on providing yet another manua
Actually I was wondering because it might not be too late for Valve to
get in on using PB for their anti-cheat technology. I mean, seriously
they have been banging their heads against the wall for like 2 years now
over cheaters. I'm for turning this over PB or some other body that
specializes in
> Just to poke a dead horse I wonder who will have the last say
> on this thread. I put down my body weight in gold - thats 438
> Kg - that is will be Eric the Remix0r.
*poke* You must be a big boy...
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edi
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:50:26PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote:
> And the show has reached a new low!
>
> -Original Message-
> Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to
> distinguish
> posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this
> listserv.
Why woul
And the show has reached a new low!
-Original Message-
Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to
distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this
listserv.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, o
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:27 pm, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> > Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it?
>
> Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to distinguish
> posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv.
This least certainly has no end o
> Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it?
Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to distinguish
posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv.
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit yo
13 matches
Mail list logo
