Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

where no one has gone before ... *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael McKoy Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

I think Alfred said he was attempting this but was having problems so for now make do with 2.3 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Madman Sent: 13 October 2004 20:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Ohh fine

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

, October 13, 2004 9:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) hi, i can you only tell how to make an upgrade to Debian 3.1 sarge. Its your own risk, a have made 2 upgrades without problems. Your /etc/apt/sources.list must be edit and look like this. You can choose

Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Yeah, the upgrade would help me, but if I had upgraded my system, I would have done it some time ago.. That's exactly the point. I do NOT want to replace my _stable_ system with an _unstable_ one, just because of cs:source

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

--On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM +0200 Madman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A static linked binary would solve every problem. Would it? Didn't the libc/kernel interface change not long ago? My old statically-linked Tribes2 binary no longer works with Fedora Core 2, but the dynamic one does.

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 12:36, ScratchMonkey wrote: --On Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:04 PM +0200 Madman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A static linked binary would solve every problem. Would it? Didn't the libc/kernel interface change not long ago? My old statically-linked Tribes2 binary no

RE: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

] ) To boldly go where no one has gone before ... *** Transmition End *** -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ranger Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Hi, i think Sarge

Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about cs:source vs libc6 2.2. I would like a final confirmation about the fact(?) that cs:source would run only with 2.3. Because in some forums, people say different things (some say It's the problem, others think

Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: Michael McKoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Currently, CSS will only run with glibc 2.3 Hi! I've heard things about

Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

uses max 30% with an XP2800+ and a 2.6.8.1 Kernel/1000Hz There is no negative ti update to glibc 2.3.x for my system - Original Message - From: Michael McKoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem

Re: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?)

: [hlds_linux] The libc6 problem(?) Hi, Can u help me to upgrade glibc on my debian ? Thx ;) ranger wrote: Hi, at the start of cs:source i also could not start the server, because i have Debian 3.0/Stable/glibc 2.2.x ! After an upgrade to Debian 3.1/Sarge/glibc 2.3.x the server runs great and the cpu