Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-25 Thread Nathan Nagato
Oh, You crazy Canuck! ;-) On 6/24/2010 9:42 PM, Crazy Canucks wrote: > I don't know, there might be some pretty sexy aliens out there... > > On 24/06/2010 10:37 PM, Jeff Sugar wrote: > >> Ewe, a relationship with aliens? I'll stick with Platonic, thanks! >> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:20 PM,

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread Crazy Canucks
I don't know, there might be some pretty sexy aliens out there... On 24/06/2010 10:37 PM, Jeff Sugar wrote: > Ewe, a relationship with aliens? I'll stick with Platonic, thanks! > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Crazy Canuckswrote: > > >> That would make it a plutonic relationship... >> >> O

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread Jeff Sugar
Ewe, a relationship with aliens? I'll stick with Platonic, thanks! On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Crazy Canucks wrote: > That would make it a plutonic relationship... > > On 24/06/2010 8:35 PM, Shane Arnold wrote: > >- Sent from my iPhone somewhere near Pluto. > > > > On 25/06/2010 6:46 AM,

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread Crazy Canucks
That would make it a plutonic relationship... On 24/06/2010 8:35 PM, Shane Arnold wrote: >- Sent from my iPhone somewhere near Pluto. > > On 25/06/2010 6:46 AM, Nathan Nagato wrote: > >> Disregarding your disregard. :) >> >> On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote: >> >> >>> Disregarded. ;)

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread Shane Arnold
- Sent from my iPhone somewhere near Pluto. On 25/06/2010 6:46 AM, Nathan Nagato wrote: > Disregarding your disregard. :) > > On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote: > >> Disregarded. ;) >> >> On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "adminmob...@vugaming.net"< >> adminmob...@vugaming.net> wrote: >> >> Testing

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread Nathan Nagato
Disregarding your disregard. :) On 6/24/2010 6:41 PM, E3pO wrote: > Disregarded. ;) > > On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "adminmob...@vugaming.net"< > adminmob...@vugaming.net> wrote: > > Testing > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the l

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing (Please Disregard)

2010-06-24 Thread E3pO
Disregarded. ;) On Jun 24, 2010 6:37 PM, "adminmob...@vugaming.net" < adminmob...@vugaming.net> wrote: Testing ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_l

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing new srcds_i486 for l4d demo

2008-11-13 Thread gameadmin
Indeed; The timing isn't the best (the email from Chris arived just before I went to bed) so not much testing has been done, but: - Neither netconport console or any rcon method recevies anything back from any child server, although all commands succeed (the failure includes streaming the log in h

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing new srcds_i486 for l4d demo

2008-11-12 Thread gameadmin
> plus a fix for "hitting enter in the shell where the forking > sever is running makes it take 100% of cpu". Ah, we did notice that once... after that, we were running the server from a daemon manager so never experienced this at all. Good to know what the issue was, though. __

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing Cheats.

2004-12-05 Thread List Keeper
Should be able to start the server with -insecure and that will disable Valve Anti-Cheat. - Original Message - From: "hondaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 02:22 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] Testing Cheats. >A couple cheats have surfaced on so

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing Cheats.

2004-12-05 Thread 8tImER
Hello hondaman, offline mode and no internet connection (just to make sure ;)) and deleting the whole enchilada afterwards should be safe, I guess. -- A fellow [H]'er, 8tImERmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key-ID: 0xADD46137 Original t

RE: [hlds_linux] testing

2003-08-21 Thread McCormack, Chris
yes we are still here. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 August 2003 01:24 Subject: [hlds_linux] testing testing ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please

Re: [hlds_linux] testing

2003-03-01 Thread Sebastian
nt: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:27 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] testing | Or at least have the courtesy to mark them "[OT]" in the subject line. | | -- | Eric (the Deacon remix) | | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of hondaman | Sen

RE: [hlds_linux] testing

2003-03-01 Thread Tyler \"Overkill\" Schwend
orance." > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Tyler > "Overkill" Schwend > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 9:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] testing > > > Haha, I was

RE: [hlds_linux] testing

2003-03-01 Thread Alfred Reynolds
I was using telnet via a ssh console to send a message to see if the list software was responding to email requests (from on the machine itself, it wasn't for a while until I fixed it :) Sorry if I didn't take the time to include [OT] in the subject, its painful enough to construct an email that th

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing of Kernels...

2002-11-21 Thread Børge Amundsen
I have noticed great diferent between 2.4.18 and 2.4.19. Where 2.4.19 is much faster running uhlds. faster for hlds. On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:29:27PM +0100, Fredrik Guldbrandz?n wrote: | This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand | this format, some or all of thi

RE: [hlds_linux] Testing beta security modules -Saturday

2002-08-18 Thread Bob
Is port 27011 only for the duration of the beta test or will it need to be open all the time now? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric Smith Sent: 18 August 2002 06:04 To: Half-Life Dedicated Server Mailing List; Half-Life Dedicated Linux

Re: [hlds_linux] Testing beta security modules -Saturday

2002-08-18 Thread DjoDjo
>2) Anyone detected cheating during this beta test *may* get banned for it, >but only for the duration of the beta test. This means if you test a cheat >on your server while running the beta modules, you might find yourself >banned from your own server. At the end of the beta test, we'll most li