On 07/04/11 14:19, Lu Zhao wrote:
>
> First, please forgive me if this question is too silly. I had this
> question when I talked to a colleague, who has no idea about theorem
> proving at all, about the amount of proof work that can be involved in
> solving a problem. How to evaluate the amou
[Apologies if you receive multiple copies]
***
Call for Papers: SPIN 2011
18th Int. SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software
July 14-15, Snowbird, Utah, USA
Co-located with CAV 2011
*
Hi,
First, please forgive me if this question is too silly. I had this
question when I talked to a colleague, who has no idea about theorem
proving at all, about the amount of proof work that can be involved in
solving a problem. How to evaluate the amount of proof work that HOL
does? What are
2nd Call for Papers and Tutorials
International Conference on Runtime Verification (RV 2011)
September 27 - 30, 2011
San Francisco, California, USA
http://rv2011.eecs.berkeley.edu/
Runtime verification (RV) is concerned with monitoring and analysis of
software or hardware system executions. The
CALL FOR PARTICIPATION
NFM 2011
Third NASA Formal Methods Symposium
Pasadena, California, USA
April 18 - 20, 2011
http://lars-lab.jpl.nasa.gov/nfm2011
THEME
I'd like to announce a major upgrade to the HOL-Omega logic and system.
The major change is deep but important: whereas ranks were previously
an attribute of types, they are now made an attribute of kinds,
specifically of both the base kind and kind variables. This enables
the kind of a type oper