Re: [Hol-info] Taking universal quantification off an assumption

2018-07-03 Thread Dylan Melville
Okay, I imagine HOL-Light does the same. Thank you > On Jul 3, 2018, at 3:36 PM, Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro > wrote: > > Please include the mailing list in your replies. I do not know what you > are doing. Anyway, this does not look like HOL4. Are you using HOL > Light? I only know about

Re: [Hol-info] Taking universal quantification off an assumption

2018-07-03 Thread Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro
Please include the mailing list in your replies. I do not know what you are doing. Anyway, this does not look like HOL4. Are you using HOL Light? I only know about HOL4. Removing the quantifier will usually be done internally by the subsequent tactic that requires using the proposition with a

[Hol-info] Taking universal quantification off an assumption

2018-07-03 Thread Dylan Melville
Is there any tactical that can take universal quantification off of a hypothesis like how GEN_TAC does with the goal? -Dylan -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

Re: [Hol-info] Strange tactic behavior HOL-k10 vs HOL-k12

2018-07-03 Thread Michael.Norrish
This looks like a regression. Can you turn this into an issue on github please? Michael From: Waqar Ahmad via hol-info Reply-To: Waqar Ahmad <12phdwah...@seecs.edu.pk> Date: Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 01:41 To: hol-info Subject: [Hol-info] Strange tactic behavior HOL-k10 vs HOL-k12 Hi all, I