On 8/4/11 3:36 AM, "Ole Troan" wrote:
>John,
>
>[...]
>
>>> in the autonomous case where each border router injects its own
>>> understanding of what the site prefix is, into the home, this is not a
>>> problem. you'll get one prefix for each ISP.
>> [jjmb] but does this solve the problem? Thes
On Aug 3, 2011, at 21:03 , Robert Cragie wrote:
>
> L2 bridging is OK if you can do it but not everything looks like Ethernet
> frames. Not only that but if we have multi-link subnets using route-over, the
> router to host ratio goes up considerably. The problem space is then
> multi-link subne
John,
[...]
>> in the autonomous case where each border router injects its own
>> understanding of what the site prefix is, into the home, this is not a
>> problem. you'll get one prefix for each ISP.
> [jjmb] but does this solve the problem? These prefixes will both be
> active simultaneously?
