Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link + button

2011-11-28 Thread Lorenzo Colitti
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 17:43, Mark Townsley towns...@cisco.com wrote: Before we decide that we must have an IGP, that it must be cryptographically secured, and that we have to tackle key distribution for it, I'd like to take a step or two back from the routing protocol part of the equation.

Re: [homenet] other routing options

2011-11-28 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-11-26 15:17, Russ White wrote: TRILL is not an IP routing protocol. It's a layer 2 bridging protocol more complicated than the spanning tree, and seems completely unnecessary for the small size of bridged networks to be expected in homenets. What might actually be ideal is something

Re: [homenet] Creating a security association via physical link + button

2011-11-28 Thread Mark Baugher
In my experience, there is no single mechanism for establishing what is alternatively called 'pairing,' 'introduction,' 'enrollment,' on in the case of the WiFi Protected Setup a 'mental model.' The techniques have been called ceremonies by Carl Ellison and Jesse Walker, and they serve as a