On May 7, 2012, at 11:39 , Dan Wing wrote:
>
> I don't know how to make one of these systems work without a
> rendezvous service, and it seems nobody else does, either --
> all of them rely on some sort of rendezvous service that is
> separate from the service provided by the typical residential
On 05/08/2012 05:13 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Dan" == Dan Wing writes:
Dan> If the subscriber's IP address really is static, the subscriber
Dan> can avoid DNS entirely, and just put their static IPv6 (or
Dan> IPv4) address into their portable computing device (tablet, PC,
> "Dan" == Dan Wing writes:
Dan> If the subscriber's IP address really is static, the subscriber
Dan> can avoid DNS entirely, and just put their static IPv6 (or
Dan> IPv4) address into their portable computing device (tablet, PC,
Dan> whatever) and they're done. That way, the
> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter writes:
Brian> Can we either have a problem statement draft or declare this
Brian> out of scope?
Brian> IMHO it's a legitimate topic but probably one for later.
"for later" +1
This problem can be solved once we figure out how DNS works.
--
]
> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter writes:
>> I read this document just now. What I understand is that
>> level-2+ routers go to "the" ISP to get an additional /64. The
>> ISP could return anything... it might be good if it returned a
>> /64 adjacent to those already assigned, b
