Ted Lemon wrote:
>> 4) A CableLabsHome, below a homenet router would see no Internet, so
>> it would be turned off.
tl> This would be easy to fix. It would be hard to make it work well,
tl> but it would be easy to make it work at least as well as 6204bis.
I am incorrect on two
Ted Lemon wrote:
tl> On Jun 18, 2013, at 10:26 AM, Ray Bellis
tl> wrote:
>> It might work if the Homenet routers were attached as stubs "below"
>> HIPnet routers, but I don't think you could fully mesh and/or mix
>> them.
tl> Right. I think this limitation applies to 6
What technical constraints are present that do not allow us to move to a
homenet future (currently envisioned one in the WG) world?
If they are present, are those constraints any different then the ones we
have moving from what we have today (6204/6204bis) to the envisioned future
homenet?
I don'
Ole Troan wrote:
>> The HIPnet work feels like a good attempt at how to bridge the gap. It
>> may not be the only solution, but is the only one I have seen proposed
>> so far. My general feeling though is most people on the list aren't
>> concerned with how to bridge the gap othe
