Re: [homenet] WGLC on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-09

2017-07-07 Thread Ted Lemon
Your second suggestion is what I meant. Thanks for taking the time to write it—I totally missed the conflicting meaning of "validate". > On Jul 7, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > Hi there, > > I have read the -09 draft. I think I am confused (but maybe I am > confused about tha

Re: [homenet] WGLC on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-09

2017-07-07 Thread Andrew Sullivan
Hi there, I have read the -09 draft. I think I am confused (but maybe I am confused about that). It says 5. No special processing of '.home.arpa' is required for authoritative DNS server implementations. However, it is possible that an authoritative DNS server might attempt t

[homenet] Reminder - Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-homenet-dot-09

2017-07-07 Thread Ray Bellis
The WGLC on this is due to run out next Tuesday. We've had a couple of comments, but we still need more people to confirm that they've read it and are happy for it to leave the WG. thanks, Ray On 04/07/2017 10:32, Ray Bellis wrote: > Given the relatively large number of changes in this document