>>> 1) DNCP allows an option of whether a network state TLV contains optional
>>> nested payload (HNCP) TLV's or not.
>> I'm pretty sure that's not the case. RFC 7787 Section 7.2.2.
> A OK so you're saying this is already covered in (Section 4.4 of) 7787
[...]
> state hash. The Node Sta
Thanks for your response.
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote on 20/09/2019 12:40:
1) DNCP allows an option of whether a network state TLV contains optional
nested payload (HNCP) TLV's or not.
I'm pretty sure that's not the case. RFC 7787 Section 7.2.2.
The Network-State TLV only contains the network st
> 1) DNCP allows an option of whether a network state TLV contains optional
> nested payload (HNCP) TLV's or not.
I'm pretty sure that's not the case. RFC 7787 Section 7.2.2.
The Network-State TLV only contains the network state hash, short
Node-State TLVs are separate top-level TLVs. An implem
Hi,I've done some more investigation and the "problem" packet size growth looks to be the result of a single UDP reply packet containing multiple node state TLV's.This reply is triggered by a query from a new node joining an existing network, where the new node requests node TLV updates for all of
