Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt

Ray and Christophe and others, As the responsible AD for this draft, would you mind forwarding/adding mbo...@ietf.org to the recipient list? So that authors can read your valuable comments? Thank you -éric From: homenet on behalf of "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" Date: Wedn

Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt

Hi,   I have a couple of naive questions * Section 3.1.1 «Since typically there are no ACKs for multicast packets...» Does anyone remember why WiFi had chosen not to acknowledge  multicast/broadcast packets? This choice was certainly made on the basis of assumptions. Which ones? Are these assumpt

Re: [homenet] https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems-09.txt

Dave Taht wrote on 23/10/2019 08:56: has anyone here had much chance to review this? Thanks for the prompt. From a pure Homenet perspective, it reinforces that L3 routing is the correct solution for segmenting networks where end nodes have different characteristics. e.g. battery powered or