On Jul 24, 2020, at 07:04, otr...@employees.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Cause it's architecturally "challenged"?
>>
>> The working group or the solution?
>
> Not sure how you could interpret that as pointing to the working group.
>
> The solution obviously.
> IPv4 "pass through" implies sharing the
> On 23 Jul 2020, at 18:58, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> This is very cool.
> Is it written up as a specification somewhere? What is the signal that the
> device behind is a router, and not a PC?
>
> Why isn't homenet standardizing this?
Cause it's architecturally "challenged"?
Cheers,
