Thanks for the response Ian,
This seems to confirm that assuming per-subscribers responses is something
widely deployed.
Thanks!
Yours,
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I can’t speak to A), but we have built and tested DHCPv6 infrastructure
> using ISC’s Kea
Thanks for the response Mikael,
In this case, I have the impression the L2 switch uses the MAC address to
determine what type of devices is initiating the DHCP request and orient
the DHCP request to the appropriated VLN and DHCP server. I suspect that
the type of device is determined the OUIs and
Probably, but others, could do it and have a collision (unsure whether those
set the U/L bit correctly)
-éric
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Abrahamsson
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
Date: Saturday, 21 November 2020 at 17:43
To: Eric Vyncke
Cc: Daniel Migault , homenet
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
The idea to identity the kind of devices (hence any QoE) based on MAC
address (probably on the OUI part) has work for many years; but, now
more and more OS do MAC address randomization (cfr the MADINAS BoF at
IETF-109), so, I am afraid that
Hi Mikael,
The idea to identity the kind of devices (hence any QoE) based on MAC address
(probably on the OUI part) has work for many years; but, now more and more OS
do MAC address randomization (cfr the MADINAS BoF at IETF-109), so, I am afraid
that this 'easy/smart' technique is a thing of
