Re: [homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted

2021-03-26 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, No, DANE can be used but is not mandated. Yours, Daniel On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:00 PM Michael Thomas wrote: > > On 3/26/21 12:47 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I completed the CDDL description for section 14. > > We hummed and hawed about YANG vs CDDL for describing this

Re: [homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted

2021-03-26 Thread Michael Thomas
On 3/26/21 12:47 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: Hi, I completed the CDDL description for section 14. We hummed and hawed about YANG vs CDDL for describing this non-normative bit of JSON, and settled on CDDL. I think that I need to revise Appendix B to be sure it matches. We have posted -13 b

Re: [homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted

2021-03-26 Thread Daniel Migault
Thanks Michael for putting this together. I understand that the XX well known port is the port you reach the DM for the Control Channel. In our case by default we are using DoT so XX = 853 by default but other ports may be used if you are using DoH for example.We can also envision that SVCB will r

[homenet] version of -13 of draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation posted

2021-03-26 Thread Michael Richardson
Hi, I completed the CDDL description for section 14. We hummed and hawed about YANG vs CDDL for describing this non-normative bit of JSON, and settled on CDDL. I think that I need to revise Appendix B to be sure it matches. We have posted -13 because it has been more than two months, and while

[homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-13.txt

2021-03-26 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Home Networking WG of the IETF. Title : Simple Provisioning of Public Names for Residential Networks Authors : Daniel Migault