Hi Erik,
Thanks for the careful review. That is really much appreciated. We have
addressed most of the changes in line as well as here:
https://github.com/ietf-homenet-wg/ietf-homenet-hna/commit/f9157a3db159dc327a3e9d5c85e9f9f83a458729
There is one remaining change we need to make, and I hope
Makes sense. Interesting topic, but significantly different. Might converge
at some point, but not now.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 21:54 Michael Richardson
wrote:
>
> Marc Blanchet wrote:
> >> Also, because ICN does not involve making active (in the TCP sense)
> >> connections to the
Marc Blanchet wrote:
>> Also, because ICN does not involve making active (in the TCP sense)
>> connections to the sensors, it means that there is no inherent trust
>> that must be created in the sensors in order for them to communicate:
>> they simply announce their state and
> Le 8 août 2022 à 17:00, Michael Richardson a écrit :
>
>
> On Tuesday 2022-07-26, six local people and three remote attendees got
> together to talk about the Gateway to Gateway communication situation.
> The remote participant access was probably very poor, but that's the
> situation
On Tuesday 2022-07-26, six local people and three remote attendees got
together to talk about the Gateway to Gateway communication situation.
The remote participant access was probably very poor, but that's the
situation today for side meetings.
After some introductions, the slides from Wei were
As usual, I do my own review before requesting the IETF Last Call for all
documents. The intent is to give another polishing pass on the I-D.
For this review, the MD format is used.
Hope this helps
Regards
-éric
# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for
As usual, I do my own review before requesting the IETF Last Call for all
documents. The intent is to give another polishing pass on the I-D.
For this review, the MD format is used.
Hope this helps
Regards
-éric
# Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for
