Re: [homenet] homenet naming drafts "terminology"

2021-05-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 6. May 2021, at 00:06, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Ole Troan wrote: >> Is this the same as a hidden primary name server? > > That's Stealth Primary. > The DM is not a stealth primary, because it's not primary. > It hasn't got the DNSSEC signing keys, for instance. Distribution hub

Re: [homenet] [Captive-portals] [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Evaluate impact of MAC address randomization to IP applications

2020-09-30 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2020-09-30, at 19:16, Michael Richardson wrote: > > the > adversary There may be more than one. Of course, if you want to attack privacy, being Google or Facebook gives you unique opportunities. That doesn’t mean you don’t want to have a seat belt any more if you have lane-keeping

Re: [homenet] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-09: (with DISCUSS)

2015-11-18 Thread Carsten Bormann
Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Just to clarify, mandatory to implement doesn't mean you have to write the >> code. It means the functionality has to be present in the deployed >> implementation so that two communicating partners can be configured to use >> it. > > Um, where is that defined?