On 15 Nov 2011, at 11:20 , Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2011-11-15 16:03, Tim Chown wrote: >> So at the moment all the arch text says on privacy is: >> Privacy considerations >> >> There are no specific privacy concerns for this text. It should >> be noted that most ISPs are expected to offer static IPv6 prefixes >> to customers, and thus the addresses they use would not generally >> change over time. >> What would you like to say here instead? > > Maybe point out that a homenet can be protected against external privacy > threats (possibly citing 4864 etc) but that whatever hosts do, the homenet > admin has the capability to perform traffic analysis down to the subnet level. > And I think it MUST have that capability to avoid problems arising from any abuse originated there, especially at the guest subnet...
-- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D e-mail: di...@tid.es Tel: +34 913 129 041 ----------------------------------------- Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at. http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
