On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Mark Townsley wrote:
>>> I suggest that ANIMA focus on "professionally-managed" networks first,
>>> with "Homenet" being a secondary consideration, akin to IPv4 is in the
>>> homenet WG.
>
>> I like that suggestion, with a caveat. The
ee
>
> On 10/3/14, 7:34 PM, "Mark Baugher (mbaugher)" wrote:
>
>> I voiced the opinion that someone has to own the homenet, as distinct
>> from who might own the CPEs and routers on the homenet. In the same
>> way that some ISP CPEs let the user set the Wi-
I voiced the opinion that someone has to own the homenet, as distinct
from who might own the CPEs and routers on the homenet. In the same
way that some ISP CPEs let the user set the Wi-Fi password, the user or
an agent for the use needs to take homenet ownership (or in the case of
autonomic device
On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
>
> There’s obviously some interesting implications of this. One is that there
> are insecure wired links too!
That's a good point. And I wonder about malware on end systems as well.
Mark
___
homenet
On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Markus Stenberg wrote:
> On 15.7.2014, at 21.35, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>>> I assume you mean that we need to recommend a default policy and also
>>> document the range of other policies that the end user might choose to
>>> use.
>>
>> No, I just mean that M
