+1 - well said. If it weren't actually a serious issue, I would find the
constant bickering in homenet re. routing protocol quite comical. I come
from the other end of the spectrum (LLNs) and was put off a while ago with
the general disdain for catering for anything the light switch guys (as
we
Yes, but who's to say a light bulb won't be a home router? 6LoWPAN ND
and RPL introduce the the concept of 6LRs and RPL Routers respectively,
which are generally small devices (i.e. around the figures Frank
mentions below) with a single wireless network interface.
These devices rarely seem to
On 14/03/2013 9:42 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 03/14/2013 10:03 AM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
[...]
In today's world access control is gated at L2 via wpa or similar.
Are you
suggesting that we have a L3 equivalent? In addition? In
On 12/11/2012 11:47 AM, Mark Townsley wrote:
On Nov 10, 2012, at 2:21 AM, Robert Cragie wrote:
On 09/11/2012 7:56 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
(and that's why RPL isn't on the table at homenet)
RCCWhy not? Again, the sort of networks which would use RPL (LLNs)
are referred to in the charter
On 09/11/2012 7:56 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
(and that's why RPL isn't on the table at homenet)
RCCWhy not? Again, the sort of networks which would use RPL (LLNs) are
referred to in the charter./RCC
___
homenet mailing list
Comment inline.
Robert
On 08/11/2012 12:25 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 08/11/2012 12:05, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fine, but when such an end customer buys a second router and plugs it in,
will she get an error
be coordinated via the routing protocol (for example, using a
new OSPF Opaque LSA).
Curtis
On 9/25/12 1:57 AM, Robert Cragie robert.cra...@gridmerge.com wrote:
So let's tweak Curtis' sequence slightly:
What every host does is:
if it has no MAC:
pick a random link local address
else
use
a statement that device designers must assume
that DDoS and other forms of malicious traffic are present on
the homenet, as well as a statement that all traffic may be visible
to unknown third parties. A sort of generic threat model for homenets.
Regards
Brian
On 2012-03-29 00:20, Robert Cragie wrote
(catching up on the homenet ML...)
Comments inline, bracketed by RCC/RCC
Robert
On 14/03/2012 5:11 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Ashok Narayananash...@cisco.com wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012, at 3/13 9:16 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
That's reality, and much as I love
I've been following this thread with interest. Some points (from someone
who has a particular 802.15.4-based mesh networking viewpoint):
* There probably isn't any need to specify cryptographic security for
an IGP on the basis that the packets are link-local and can
therefore be
10 matches
Mail list logo
