Some time back Tony Finch proposed a 2317bis -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2317bis-00
which the WG adopted but died for lack of interest.
It would be useful to revise this document
tim
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:14 AM Havard Eidnes
wrote:
> > Hi, while editing draf
Reviewer: Tim Wicinski
Review result: Ready
Hi
As one of the assigned reviewers of this document for DNS Directorate for this
draft.
I have read the other DNS Directorate reviews for this draft, and I agree with
how the
comments raised are being addressed.I do appreciate the examples in
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 9:48 AM Michael Richardson via dnsdir <
dns...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> as> Reviewer: Anthony Somerset
> as> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> as> Section 3.2 = "SHOULD remain pointing at the cloud provider's
> server IP address
> as> - which in many cases will
Apologies, I should never use the phone to send emails, I always hit send
to do this.
I was trying to say cmake on OSX is a real pain, I had this problem a year
ago and I ended up doing it in a container.
I went back to my computer to find the container, and it's gone, and then I
remember it was a
Instead of calling it a "DNS Server" perhaps call it the "declarative data
store"? it could be a git repo,
tim
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> The DNS server in the cloud doesn't have to answer queries. Indeed, it
> probably shouldn't. It's really just a backing store.
If you have no ULA, then you may have to fall back to manual creation of
the homenet domain in 4.7, which is less than ideal.
tim
ps - i've read the draft and think it's ready for adoption. Needs some
fleshing out, but it's has a good foundation.
On 7/19/16 11:22 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
Ye
On 6/16/16 2:48 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
On Jun 16, 2016, at 1:26 PM 6/16/16, Ray Bellis wrote:
As was alluded to in my email of 9th June, we have been asked to replace
RFC 7788 (HNCP) with an RFC 7788-bis as soon as possible to incorporate
the errata raised by the DNSOP chair regarding the u
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7788&eid=4677
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Tim Wicinski
Section: 8
Original Text
-
A network-wide
zone is appended to all single labels or unq
On 3/26/14, 5:30 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
I have read the HNCP draft, and while it is very rough, and lacks greatly in
the area of "how", being focused on the "what", I am happy with the WG
adopting it, and then improving it.
After reading the draft again, I agree the WG should adopt this