Mark,
> One think I haven't seen mentions w.r.t. firewalls is protecting
> the rest of the world from compromised home machines. While ISP's
> should be doing BCP 38 filtering, CPE devices should also be
> filtering outgoing traffic that is not from a valid prefix. The
> border CPE also needs t
On Aug 7, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> One think I haven't seen mentions w.r.t. firewalls is protecting the rest of
> the world from compromised home machines. While ISP's should be doing BCP 38
> filtering, CPE devices should also be filtering outgoing traffic that is not
> from
; Behalf Of Roger Jørgensen
>> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:58 PM
>> To: james woodyatt
>> Cc: homenet@ietf.org; Fernando Gont
>> Subject: Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyatt wrote:
>
One think I haven't seen mentions w.r.t. firewalls is protecting
the rest of the world from compromised home machines. While ISP's
should be doing BCP 38 filtering, CPE devices should also be
filtering outgoing traffic that is not from a valid prefix. The
border CPE also needs to filter ULA sou
On 07/08/11 16:08, Russ White wrote:
In one hand, we want the capability to reach anywhere we're allowed to from
home. OTOH, if anything in my home is reachable from anywhere, we are back to
the firewall paradigm.
Why? You are still back to all the security disadvantages of firewalls - soft
On Aug 7, 2011 4:51 AM, "Sander Steffann" wrote:
>
> >> In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that
restoring general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal.
> >
> > +1
>
>
> +1
>
+1
Cb
> Sander
>
> ___
> homenet mailing l
>> In one hand, we want the capability to reach anywhere we're allowed to from
>> home. OTOH, if anything in my home is reachable from anywhere, we are back
>> to the firewall paradigm.
>>
> Why? You are still back to all the security disadvantages of firewalls - soft
> chewy inside, etc. Reac
org] On
>> Behalf Of Roger Jørgensen
>> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:58 PM
>> To: james woodyatt
>> Cc: homenet@ietf.org; Fernando Gont
>> Subject: Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyat
etf.org] On
> Behalf Of Roger Jørgensen
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:58 PM
> To: james woodyatt
> Cc: homenet@ietf.org; Fernando Gont
> Subject: Re: [homenet] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
>
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyatt wrote:
>
> &
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:18 AM, james woodyatt wrote:
> In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that restoring
> general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal.
+1 :-)
--
Roger Jorgensen |
rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jo
>> In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that restoring
>> general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal.
>
> +1
+1
Sander
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
On 7 Aug 2011, at 02:18, "james woodyatt" wrote:
> In the context of the HOMENET working group, one imagines that restoring
> general end-to-end reachability is arguably a worthy goal.
+1
(no hat)
Ray
___
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 19:57 , Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 11:38 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>>
>> The opportunity for restoring e2e is one of the great opportunities of ipv6
>
> This assumes that e2e reachability is a desired property for all networks.
In the context of the HOMENET working
13 matches
Mail list logo
