Thanks for the response.
Yours,
Daniel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 3:49 AM Miek Gieben wrote:
> [ Quoting in "Re: [homenet] Dnsdir telechat
> revie..." ]
> >OLD:
> >It is worth noticing that the Supported Transport field does not enable to
> >specify a port and the used port is defined by standard.
[ Quoting in "Re: [homenet] Dnsdir telechat revie..." ]
OLD:
It is worth noticing that the Supported Transport field does not enable to
specify a port and the used port is defined by standard.
NEW:
It is worth noticing that the Supported Transport field does not enable to
specify a port and
Hi,
Thanks for the review. So the reason we do not consider DOH is that DoH
8484 has been defined for communications between a client and a resolver
while in our case TLS is used between two authoritative servers.
This document focuses on communication between DNS
clients (such as operating
Reviewer: R. Gieben
Review result: Ready with Nits
A straight forward document specifying dhcpv6 options, had little trouble
reading it. Got a bit lost with acronyms though, i.e. forgetting what ORO is
when nearing the end of the document.
Any reason why DNS over HTTP (DoH, RFC 8484) isn't standa
