Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Ray, > Thanks for the reply. See inline. >> Pierre Pfister >> 18 March 2015 07:46 >> Hello Ray, >> >> Thanks for the comments, and for making these experimentations. >> >> Comments inline, >> >> >>> OK Got it. Thanks. >>> >>> Another question. I've been testin

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Thanks for the reply. See inline. Pierre Pfister 18 March 2015 07:46 Hello Ray, Thanks for the comments, and for making these experimentations. Comments inline, OK Got it. Thanks. Another question. I've been testing with smaller prefixes than that required t

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Hello Ray, Thanks for the comments, and for making these experimentations. Comments inline, > OK Got it. Thanks. > > Another question. I've been testing with smaller prefixes than that required > to configure the Homenet. > > Is behavior defined for that situation? In the past version of th

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Pierre Pfister 14 March 2015 09:10 Hello Ray, Thanks for the review. Their actually is something about that already. Sub-delegation is one of the purposes of the so called « Private Links » Private Link: A Private Link is an abstract concept defined for the s

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Hello Ray, Thanks for the review. > I've just been testing this feature, which is why I asked ;) > > /56 was requested by hnet router to ISP router. > > /62 was (correctly) allocated to the 7084 router by the hnet router. > route to /62was (correctly) advertised by the hnet router into Homenet.

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

Steven Barth 12 March 2015 18:11 I have read this draft. It looks very good. I agree (having reviewed probably all the various iterations of that document). I have the following questions: 1. What are the interoperability considerations if the node also contains

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

I have read this draft. It looks very good. I agree (having reviewed probably all the various iterations of that document). I have the following questions: 1. What are the interoperability considerations if the node also contains (historical) configuration for acting as an RFC7084 router?

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

I have read this draft. It looks very good. I have the following questions: 1. What are the interoperability considerations if the node also contains (historical) configuration for acting as an RFC7084 router? Especially with respect to requirement L2 and L8. I came across this whilst testin

[homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-03.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Home Networking Working Group of the IETF. Title : Distributed Prefix Assignment Algorithm Authors : Pierre Pfister Benjami