Home gateways are typically not recursive resolvers. They're usually just
translators for non-recursive DNS query/responses. Some have forwarding
servers. There might be some that are recursive resolvers, but there are
lot of good reasons not to put one there, starting with the fact that some
Dear colleagues,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:16:30AM -0700, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Home Networking Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Outsourcing
Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com wrote:
Of course, it _has_ to be this way, because the document continues to
recommend that signing happen outside the CPE, and therefore the CPE
can't respond with signed records. Even if signing did happen on the
CPE, there'd be a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:06:25PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
What about, in the case where the signing is elsewhere, that the CPE should
be a local secondary for the zone?
Under DNSSEC, either the CPE has to be in the NS RRset (because
otherwise it would fail validation; but this
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Home Networking Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Outsourcing Home Network Authoritative Naming Service
Authors : Daniel Migault
