>> this document tries to describe would see adoption, it's become very
>> clear that dynamic DNS services as described in Section 4 have won out
>> here. These services are far from perfect, but at least some of the
>> limitations in Section 4 have been addressed, and others are arguably a
>>
Michael's point is indeed important: reverse DNS and, IMHO, justifies the whole
effort of the two related I-Ds. Whether they will be implemented is still a
valid question...
Regards
-éric
On 21/10/2022, 08:50, "homenet on behalf of Michael Richardson"
wrote:
Lars Eggert via
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 7:45 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> I agree with the Discusses and Comments on this document - this simply
> isn't
> implementable as described.
>
I have no opinion on this per sé, but...
> My main reason for abstaining is something else
Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:
> this document tries to describe would see adoption, it's become very
> clear that dynamic DNS services as described in Section 4 have won out
> here. These services are far from perfect, but at least some of the
> limitations in Section 4 have
Apologies; disregard - I entered this for the wrong document.
> On 2022-10-20, at 14:45, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-22: Abstain
>
> When responding, please keep the
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-22: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
