> On Aug 8, 2015, at 4:36 AMPDT, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>
>> What you are suggesting here is heresy. You are saying that the basic
>> assumption made 35 years ago, Layering, doesn't work. What a surprise.
>
> No. What this says is that strict layering has a performance cost, and
> a wa
> What you are suggesting here is heresy. You are saying that the basic
> assumption made 35 years ago, Layering, doesn't work. What a surprise.
No. What this says is that strict layering has a performance cost, and
a way to recover some of this performance is to organise carefully
controlled l
