Re: [homenet] Quality of vendor implementations [was: T.M.S. proudly presents]

2015-03-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> My bet is what would be even more effective is to have bits of code > readily available (either in-spec, or in-github) so that little-to-no > thinking is required. Perhaps that's worth repeating. The reference implementation of Babel is available on Github: https://github.com/jech/babeld

Re: [homenet] Quality of vendor implementations [was: T.M.S. proudly presents]

2015-03-27 Thread Michael Thomas
On 03/27/2015 04:31 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: More precisely, here's the approach I've taken in RFC 6126 (credit to Joel Halpern for helping me with that): * if something is required to ensure the integrity of the network, it's a MUST. In particular, bidirectional reachability detec

[homenet] Quality of vendor implementations [was: T.M.S. proudly presents]

2015-03-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
>> Link quality estimation is in the informative appendix A.2.2. > This is more than a little bit problematic if we want router vendors to > be able to produce useful implementations: they generally are not > interested in doing research, and just ship whatever firmware their wifi > chip vendor te