> On 28.5.2015, at 23.45, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>
>
>> Section 5.2 explicitly says how to reach to each TLV (and no semantics
>> about this, IIRC).
>
>> Section 5.3 states what Node Endpoint TLV means (=I want to be your
>> neighbor), section 5 (start) says that that TLV is used for for
> Section 5.2 explicitly says how to reach to each TLV (and no semantics
> about this, IIRC).
> Section 5.3 states what Node Endpoint TLV means (=I want to be your
> neighbor), section 5 (start) says that that TLV is used for forming
> bidirectional peer relationships..
> How would you make it m
On 28.5.2015, at 19.20, Dave Taht wrote:
(3) it is impossible to act as a dumb DNCP forwarder without publishing
a Node-State TLV and a full set of Neighbor sub-TLVs.
>>> This is not true. Given basic bridging of ‘remember one guy on end of
>>> each link’, you can do essentially bridging
On 28.5.2015, at 18.38, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
>>> (1) it is impossible to reliably snoop the protocol without contributing
>>> a Node-State TLV and a full set of Neighbor sub-TLVs;
>> This is not true, at least assuming the profile specifies even partially
>> multicast-using profile. In pure
>>> (3) it is impossible to act as a dumb DNCP forwarder without publishing
>>> a Node-State TLV and a full set of Neighbor sub-TLVs.
>
>> This is not true. Given basic bridging of ‘remember one guy on end of
>> each link’, you can do essentially bridging.
so my use case (wanting routers without a
>> (1) it is impossible to reliably snoop the protocol without contributing
>> a Node-State TLV and a full set of Neighbor sub-TLVs;
> This is not true, at least assuming the profile specifies even partially
> multicast-using profile. In pure unicast setup, you have to poll,
> I guess. (HNCP isn’t
On 28.5.2015, at 16.11, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the recent reviews and update of draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.
>> Please take the next 3 weeks to make your final reviews.
>
> I strongly support this work. We have recently set up an HNCP experiment
> here in Paris (together with
> Thank you for the recent reviews and update of draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.
> Please take the next 3 weeks to make your final reviews.
I strongly support this work. We have recently set up an HNCP experiment
here in Paris (together with Thomas Denecker), and in the superficial
testing we did, it wo
Hi,
This is really just an FYI for the WG, not a direct comment on the draft.
The latest posted draft of the proposed Anima signalling protocol
is draft-carpenter-anima-gdn-protocol-03. It's by no means a WG draft
and big changes may be coming. However, the present draft attempts
to use a TLV for
Dear WG,
Thank you for the recent reviews and update of draft-ietf-homenet-dncp.
Please take the next 3 weeks to make your final reviews. WG Last Call will
officially end on May 28.
Thank you,
- Mark and Ray
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ray Bellis
wrote:
>
> Please provide further reviews
10 matches
Mail list logo
