section 6.3.3 contemplates sending out verdicts for a period of time
until a decision can be rendered, giving up after 10 minutes.
I think, that since hncp is using trickle, it can just rely on trickle saying
that we haven't got any new information, so just don't say anything.
I assume that
On 22 Oct 2014, at 02:02, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
Up one more level: the charter looks pretty out of date in general.
Hi Brian,
The charter itself still reflects our primary focus. I believe it still
accurately reflects the constraints on our scope.
The
On 22/10/2014 23:54, Ray Bellis wrote:
On 22 Oct 2014, at 02:02, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Up one more level: the charter looks pretty out of date in general.
Hi Brian,
The charter itself still reflects our primary focus. I believe it still
accurately
On 10/22/14, 12:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 22/10/2014 23:54, Ray Bellis wrote:
On 22 Oct 2014, at 02:02, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
Up one more level: the charter looks pretty out of date in general.
Hi Brian,
The charter itself still reflects our primary
Hi,
I agree with whoever it was that said there is not enough explanation
of the threat model in this draft. The result is that I really can't
evaluate whether the proposed solution is complete or adequate.
The other thing that bothers me is that we need a secure homenet, not
just a secure HNCP.
I agree with whoever it was that said there is not enough explanation
of the threat model in this draft. The result is that I really can't
evaluate whether the proposed solution is complete or adequate.
From my point of view there are two vectors through which you can attack
HNCP - as
I just pushed a new revision of the draft.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barth-homenet-hncp-security-trust-01
Most notable changes:
* Some clarifications to the consensus based trust scheme
* PSK-management now supports key-derivation for different protocols
(IGPs, ...)
* Underlying crypto
.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barth-homenet-hncp-security-trust-01
Most notable changes:
* Some clarifications to the consensus based trust scheme
* PSK-management now supports key-derivation for different protocols
(IGPs, ...)
* Underlying crypto scheme changed to DTLS for now
* Some
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Steven Barth wrote:
Please note that this draft is in a very early stage so please help to
make additions, provide feedback and point out mistakes.
Being a crypto novice, let me write some text and please tell me if it
makes sense in the context of your draft (thanks for
Hi Mikael,
thanks for your feedback.
Being a crypto novice, let me write some text and please tell me if it
makes sense in the context of your draft (thanks for writing it, it
looks like a good summary).
I do not consider myself to be a crypto expert either which is one of
the reasons I'd
10 matches
Mail list logo
