Good day everyone,
As you may have recently learned, most of our Disaster Mapping responses are
much more a marathon than sprint. It often takes several days to pinpoint
where the needs are greatest, but I must say that we have been very good at
setting our priority areas for mapping during the
Oops, yes a few typos there, including it should be nearly "1,000,000" edits
for Hurricane Patricia;
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=huracanpatricia#2/7.5/
15.8
=Russ
From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:36 AM
To: ho
Oh, I must be tired - going to bed soon - make that nearly "15,000" road
segments for the earthquake response.
Good night,
=Russ
From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:43 AM
To: hot (hot@openstreetmap.org)
Subject: RE: Activation Updates
Very interesting...
Thanks all for your help, as always!
Pete
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Blake Girardot
wrote:
> I like to explain it in terms of land usage, people reside here on the
> land in some way, therefore landuse=residential that is how it works
> best in my experience. Fits fu
I am so proud and honored to be a part of this amazing community!
We are indeed quite awesome.
Suzan
On Oct 30, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Russell Deffner wrote:
Oh, I must be tired – going to bed soon – make that nearly “15,000” road
segments for the earthquake response.
Good night,
=Russ
Fro
Russ, thanks for sharing this update. The dedication that all of you who
contributed and continue to contribute to these responses has certainly
been impressive. Thanks to the HOT Activators and all those involved in the
activation for your commitment & dedication.
Tyler
*Tyler Radford*
Executive
Thanks everyone for all your efforts this week.
Please do remember to go for a walk outside, get some rest or do something
peaceful.
Thanks again for being so inspiring
Heather
Heather Leson
heatherle...@gmail.com
Twitter: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Tyl
Does anybody know the date of the Mapbox imagery for project #1264?
Bing img analyzer is telling me the default Bing imagery is from Nov 2013.
I was wondering if the MapBox imagery was newer than this or not.
Thanks,
Tom G.
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@ope
If I understand Camilla's blog correctly, it must be "new imagery from
the last few months".
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/satellite-af-quake/
Jean-Guilhem
Le 30/10/2015 14:27, Tom Gertin a écrit :
> Does anybody know the date of the Mapbox imagery for project #1264?
>
> Bing img analyzer is tel
Yes, this is newer than Bing (but still pre-quake imagery).
Unfortunately, in order to get cloud-free mosaic, it came from various
dates.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Jean-Guilhem Cailton wrote:
> If I understand Camilla's blog correctly, it must be "new imagery from the
> last few months".
>
Hi All –
I was trying an export for the eastern Mediterranean area (where MapAction
volunteers are deployed, supporting UNHCR), but found it was outside the ‘valid
export region’. Is there any way to bypass this please? I can always go to
Overpass, but the HOT export tool makes the process much
Hi Nick,
I discussed this in the morning with our product manager Mhairi (cc'd) and
we are adding Greece. Mhairi will let you know once it's done.
Thanks for the compliment on the tool!
Best
Tyler
*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
email: tyler.radf...@hotosm.org
U.S. mobile: +1 617.285.2009
*
Tyler, Mhairi – marvellous, many thanks for the quick follow-up.
Soren - many thanks, too. About Geofabrik: it provides a great service; the
limitation in this case is that includes only the 'name' tag, and not the
various different language tags of place names (as a totally random example,
see
I'm doing some mapping and validations of #1253 - Missing Maps: Lubumbashi
(east), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and I'm seeing an inconsistency in
building mapping. There are some buildings that appear to not have roofs or
worse. Some of these buildings are being mapped while others are
I have been mapping in Task 351 in the Afghanistan EQ area and in that area
have found a number of previously plotted features which are very close tot
the Mapbox satellite image, and there conclude that there is no need for an
offset. However, there is one highway feature with a source given as A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The highways from the AIMS import only very roughly follow the path of
the actual roads and in some cases there doesn't seem to be a road at
all that corresponds to the one from AIMS. Feel free to delete the
incorrect AIMS ones, or better to use the '
Distinguished HOT community and members:
My pleasure to announce the start of a series of workshops with UN OCHA
Colombia about "Geographic Data Collection" using OSM, GPS and Smartphones.
First one will be held next november 3 at Cúcuta, Colombia.
Workshop agenda can be downloaded from here (in
17 matches
Mail list logo