Re: [HOT] Activation Updates

Oh, I must be tired - going to bed soon - make that nearly "15,000" road segments for the earthquake response. Good night, =Russ From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:43 AM To: hot (hot@openstreetmap.org) Subject: RE: Activation

Re: [HOT] Quick question on village mapping

Very interesting... Thanks all for your help, as always! Pete On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Blake Girardot wrote: > I like to explain it in terms of land usage, people reside here on the > land in some way, therefore landuse=residential that is how it works > best in

[HOT] Activation Updates

Good day everyone, As you may have recently learned, most of our Disaster Mapping responses are much more a marathon than sprint. It often takes several days to pinpoint where the needs are greatest, but I must say that we have been very good at setting our priority areas for mapping during

Re: [HOT] Activation Updates

I am so proud and honored to be a part of this amazing community! We are indeed quite awesome. Suzan On Oct 30, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Russell Deffner wrote: Oh, I must be tired – going to bed soon – make that nearly “15,000” road segments for the earthquake

Re: [HOT] Activation Updates

Oops, yes a few typos there, including it should be nearly "1,000,000" edits for Hurricane Patricia; http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=huracanpatricia#2/7.5/ 15.8 =Russ From: Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org] Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 1:36 AM To:

[HOT] 1264 - Afghanistan EQ Response - Task 351

I have been mapping in Task 351 in the Afghanistan EQ area and in that area have found a number of previously plotted features which are very close tot the Mapbox satellite image, and there conclude that there is no need for an offset. However, there is one highway feature with a source given as

Re: [HOT] 1264 - Afghanistan EQ Response - Task 351

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The highways from the AIMS import only very roughly follow the path of the actual roads and in some cases there doesn't seem to be a road at all that corresponds to the one from AIMS. Feel free to delete the incorrect AIMS ones, or better to use the

[HOT] Geographic Data Collection Workshops

Distinguished HOT community and members: My pleasure to announce the start of a series of workshops with UN OCHA Colombia about "Geographic Data Collection" using OSM, GPS and Smartphones. First one will be held next november 3 at Cúcuta, Colombia. Workshop agenda can be downloaded from here (in

Re: [HOT] Activation Updates

Thanks everyone for all your efforts this week. Please do remember to go for a walk outside, get some rest or do something peaceful. Thanks again for being so inspiring Heather Heather Leson heatherle...@gmail.com Twitter: HeatherLeson Blog: textontechs.com On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:05 PM,

Re: [HOT] Activation Updates

Russ, thanks for sharing this update. The dedication that all of you who contributed and continue to contribute to these responses has certainly been impressive. Thanks to the HOT Activators and all those involved in the activation for your commitment & dedication. Tyler *Tyler Radford* Executive

[HOT] #1264 Afghanistan EQ Response 2015, Date of Imagery

Does anybody know the date of the Mapbox imagery for project #1264? Bing img analyzer is telling me the default Bing imagery is from Nov 2013. I was wondering if the MapBox imagery was newer than this or not. Thanks, Tom G. ___ HOT mailing list

Re: [HOT] #1264 Afghanistan EQ Response 2015, Date of Imagery

If I understand Camilla's blog correctly, it must be "new imagery from the last few months". https://www.mapbox.com/blog/satellite-af-quake/ Jean-Guilhem Le 30/10/2015 14:27, Tom Gertin a écrit : > Does anybody know the date of the Mapbox imagery for project #1264? > > Bing img analyzer is

Re: [HOT] #1264 Afghanistan EQ Response 2015, Date of Imagery

Yes, this is newer than Bing (but still pre-quake imagery). Unfortunately, in order to get cloud-free mosaic, it came from various dates. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Jean-Guilhem Cailton wrote: > If I understand Camilla's blog correctly, it must be "new imagery from the >

Re: [HOT] HOT OSM Export Tool: valid export region?

Hi Nick, I discussed this in the morning with our product manager Mhairi (cc'd) and we are adding Greece. Mhairi will let you know once it's done. Thanks for the compliment on the tool! Best Tyler *Tyler Radford* Executive Director email: tyler.radf...@hotosm.org U.S. mobile: +1 617.285.2009

Re: [HOT] HOT OSM Export Tool: valid export region?

Tyler, Mhairi – marvellous, many thanks for the quick follow-up. Soren - many thanks, too. About Geofabrik: it provides a great service; the limitation in this case is that includes only the 'name' tag, and not the various different language tags of place names (as a totally random example,

[HOT] Question about mapping buildings on #1253 - Missing Maps: Lubumbashi (east), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

I'm doing some mapping and validations of #1253 - Missing Maps: Lubumbashi (east), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and I'm seeing an inconsistency in building mapping. There are some buildings that appear to not have roofs or worse. Some of these buildings are being mapped while others are