On this topic, there has been concern over validators doing so much deletion of
recently mapped objects. This triggers a few monitoring sites that watch for
'suspicious changesets'; it doesn't mean much in the immediate, but thinking
longer term for the OSM project, those algorithms could be
> I think this is a different conversation, I would prefer mappers take a
> little more time and care, some buildings I've seen mapped have little
> relationship to the size or shape of the building.
>
> Cheerio John
I agree on this. Especially with respect to buildings. Roads are
fairly easy
> I would switch it: Map buildings (and maybe residential areas) first and
then roads. Buildings or residential areas help mapping roads (if a road is
a track or unclassified) while roads are no help when mapping buildings.
I would agree that mapping highways without settlements is more
>The one caution I would suggest is that "If something is worth mapping it
is worth mapping correctly". Here in Ethiopia I have spent a lot of time
adding nodes to roads that were digitized at a coarse scale. Mapping
quickly doesn't have to be done crudely.
There is no troupe of magic mapping
I would switch it: Map buildings (and maybe residential areas) first and
then roads. Buildings or residential areas help mapping roads (if a road
is a track or unclassified) while roads are no help when mapping buildings.
Am 26.02.2017 um 03:36 schrieb Vao Matua:
John,
I think there is merit
