Re: [HOT] wish list for validators.

Silvia and myself validated their mapping on 1396. I think it took us the best part of a week and a couple have been seen mapping since. Cheerio John On 9 Apr 2017 4:11 pm, "Jo" wrote: > I just wanted to mention I'm going to organize a followup meetup at one of > the

Re: [HOT] wish list for validators.

I just wanted to mention I'm going to organize a followup meetup at one of the universities that participated in that Belgian Mapathon on the 26th of April. My intention is to explain mapping with JOSM, of course, but if there are a few people that participated, who are coming back, I'll explain

Re: [HOT] wish list for validators.

Great feedback, thank you, John. This is definitely a working document so I'll begin incorporating all of your points (or feel free to edit, the settings are open), not to mention most folks have their own process for validating, so some answers may be slightly different, depending on who is

Re: [HOT] wish list for validators.

Comment on the validation FAQs. Comment one feedback, the document talks about positive feedback with "great work!" citing Martin's research. Martin's work does not say that and we have had the discussion here before about the subject. Comment two

Re: [HOT] How to save 'empty' squares?

Just mark it done. Do not add anything. Cheerio John On 8 April 2017 at 21:06, Sandy Olkowski wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry to post this question generally but I'm not sure who to ask. When > mapping a square that has no relevant features, how should we save the > work? >

Re: [HOT] wish list for validators.

Hi John, as Pete mentioned, I think there are going to be a number of features in the TM3 that will help with managing and validating projects. I've been putting together a Validation FAQ if anyone would like to contribute:

Re: [HOT] How to save 'empty' squares?

Surely you just add a comment saying "no relevant features" and mark it done? Donal On 9 Apr 2017 1:15 pm, "Sandy Olkowski" wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry to post this question generally but I'm not sure who to ask. When > mapping a square that has no relevant features, how

[HOT] How to save 'empty' squares?

Hello, Sorry to post this question generally but I'm not sure who to ask. When mapping a square that has no relevant features, how should we save the work? I've been adding a generic point and then notating: "No buildings visible. Point added in order to save changes." Is there a better method?