On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:33 PM, hyan...@gmail.com <hyan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi hotties! > > Some of us are tracing polygons over tree areas, ones are using > "landuse=forest" others "natural=wood" ¿which you consider more indicated? > Mapping trees could be helpful for high level floods. > The project GeoBolivia [1] recommended us multiple use (agroforestry), agricultural, forestry livestock and other places forest. This document (official) is the territorial classification plan goo.gl/6Dvmpk<http://t.co/KlmZJQt49Z>(in spanish). It is very difficult seeing aerial imagery determined what type of forest is . To my natural=wood is recommended, then the validation stage can contrast with the official document. Marco Antonio
_______________________________________________ HOT mailing list HOT@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot