-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I think it might do some massive damage when you change
landuse=residential to brownfield. First, it is crucial to know
where a residential are WAS. Also a brownfield in most cases doesn't
equals to a
edi 2 mai 2015 13h34
Objet : Re: [HOT] #1024 landuse=brownfield + landuse=residential
I think a better aproach to this could be update previous polygon tags, from
"landuse=residential" to "landuse=brownfield" and erase duplicated polygon.
2015-05-01 17:55 GMT-05:00 S Volk :
Thanks Michael and hyances , I see now OSM actually renders the brown colour of
brownfield over residential grey, not under. Sérgio
___
HOT mailing list
HOT@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
I think a better aproach to this could be update previous polygon tags,
from "landuse=residential" to "landuse=brownfield" and erase duplicated
polygon.
2015-05-01 17:55 GMT-05:00 S Volk :
> Hi, please, one question:
> I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for recently disappeared homes
> (c
Hello Sérgio,
I just realized that no one had answered your question yet. So I will give
it a try.
Am 02.05.2015 00:58 schrieb "S Volk" :
> I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for recently disappeared homes
(comparing DigitalGlobe 2015-04-29 with both Bing and MapGive / HIU april
2015 ima
Hi, please, one question:I'm tracing a "landuse=brownfield" poligon for
recently disappeared homes (comparing DigitalGlobe 2015-04-29 with both Bing
and MapGive / HIU april 2015 images, ) over a place where there was already a
"landuse=residential" poligon (probably will be a common case). I ask
