Re: [HOT] Validating and imagery offset

to keep those? But in the end everything should be in the "right" place, shouldn't it?   Gesendet: Montag, 24. Oktober 2016 um 16:38 Uhr Von: "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> An: Kretzer <kret...@gmx.net> Cc: "HOT Openstreetmap" <hot@ope

Re: [HOT] Validating and imagery offset

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:38 AM, john whelan wrote: > > If the buildings are way out compared to Bing then you could select one > displaced building and note the name. Now search for all the buildings, > within that search for the mapper. Hopefully all their buildings

Re: [HOT] Validating and imagery offset

This is my personal view after doing more than a fair amount of validation. If you square the buildings you are making an approximation on what the original mapper mapped. It doesn't look as pretty to leave it as it was but that is what I would do. If mappers used the JOSM building tool to

[HOT] Validating and imagery offset

Hi, as there seemed to be a need for validating the last Haiti projects, I did some tiles, though I am not very comfortable with validating - considering myself halfway experienced at best. I found several tiles that were very neatly mapped, all the buidlings squared, although they were all