At 6:03 AM +0100 1/3/01, peter karlsson wrote:
>I seem to have some problem with htdig indexing my site; it does index
>and update the pages it initially indexed, but it never finds any new
>pages, even if they are linked from the previously indexed pages.
Does your server send a Last-Modified-Si
Hi!
I seem to have some problem with htdig indexing my site; it does index
and update the pages it initially indexed, but it never finds any new
pages, even if they are linked from the previously indexed pages.
I'm using the rundig.sh script
# rundig.sh
# a script to drive ht://Dig updates
# Co
At 9:27 PM -0500 1/2/01, pc wrote:
>While watching verbore output during htdig, I noticed that the process is
>often processing urls like http:/foo.bar/doc/?M=D, http:/foo.bar/doc/?D=A,
>http:/foo.bar/doc/?N=A, and http:/foo.bar/doc/?N=D. This appears to be
This is because your Apache server has
Based on what you say, you'll probably want to have some sort of
"wrapper" CGI. This can take the user's query through the search
server and then call htsearch on the index servers using something
like ssh to execute htsearch remotely. (I would say rsh since more
people are familiar with usin
While watching verbore output during htdig, I noticed that the process is
often processing urls like http:/foo.bar/doc/?M=D, http:/foo.bar/doc/?D=A,
http:/foo.bar/doc/?N=A, and http:/foo.bar/doc/?N=D. This appears to be
creating a significant amount of duplication and I would like to prevent
this
addendum:
I forgot to mention that after the warnings comes a long list
of error messages.
thanks
Dave
--
ld32: WARNING 131: Multiply defined weak symbol:(__tf6Object) in Endings.o and
Synonym.o (2nd definition ignored).
ld32: WARNING 131: Multipl
When compiling 3.1.5 on IRIX 6.5 I get bad things.
I've tried a myriad of configur options and makefile changes
but to no avail. Any help is appreciated!
Dave
-
things are fine till this line:
g++ -o htfuzzy -L../htlib -L../htcommon -L../d
OK. Thanks for the additional info.
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Douglas Kline wrote:
>
> > I've been running some tests and my results don't seem consistent with your
> > description.
>
> I think a better way of saying this is "my description wasn't very good."
>
> Let me put it this way:
> -a
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, SMantscheff wrote:
> 1) How does htDig recognize that a document has changed? By a meta
> tag? By its content? By a header? What information do I have to send
> so that htDig knows the document's time?
By the Last-Modified: header sent by the server. If a date exists in the
d
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Sasa Mutic wrote:
> is there a way I could get information on time spent for specific
> search from htdig so that I can use that information in search results
> page ?
No, but that's not a bad idea.
As a workaround, you could use a shell, perl or other wrapper and time
htsea
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Mike Paradis wrote:
> If I could just send a small network request and receive the results,
> that would be much more efficient.
I'm not quite sure that I follow you exactly. But I think you're asking
for something along the lines of the ExternalTransport code in the 3.2
bran
Hello,
I have some questions regarding german language.
Following the example in FAQ I've made my htdig.conf,
extracted GermanWords.zip in $COMMON_DIR/german and edited htdig.conf.
I've done this:
rerun of rundig
rerun of htfuzzy endings
Still htdig cant find any words with umlauts (äöü etc), alt
hello,
is there a way I could get information on time spent for
specific search from htdig so that I can use that information in search results
page ?
regards,
Sasa Mutic
In my application, I could use some sort of remote search request.
In other words, just having the database remote is not good enough. It takes quite a
while to actually go through the big database over a network connection of course.
If I could just send a small network request and receive the
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Mike Paradis wrote:
+ Granted, this is probably a good sizes dbase.
+ The problem is the amount of time it takes for a return on a search. Searches can
+take
+ about 10 seconds or more to return and this is with only one user searching.
If you haven't any specific cause to k
15 matches
Mail list logo