At 10:26 PM 6/2/04 +0530, Philip Tellis wrote:
Sometime Today, michael assembled some asciibets to say:
> I was wanting to use Class::DBI to Model my data and H::T to View it.
> When I do this I end up with a lot of code that looks like this
>
> $tmpl->param(
> ObjAtt1 => $obj->att1,
> Ob
Quoting michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Since others are in the mood for RFCing, here's something that I was
> thinking about implementing for myself and I just wanted to know how
> others felt about it as well.
This has come up many times on the list. Search the archives for some other
opinions
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, michael wrote:
> And then the accompanying tmpl_vars in the templates. I was thinking about
> using something similar to the way Template Toolkit handles it where I can
> just specify an object and then have H::T pull the attributes (or methods) as
> needed. Something like thi
Sometime Today, michael assembled some asciibets to say:
> I was wanting to use Class::DBI to Model my data and H::T to View it.
> When I do this I end up with a lot of code that looks like this
>
> $tmpl->param(
> ObjAtt1 => $obj->att1,
> ObjAtt2 => $obj->att2,
> ObjAtt3 => $obj->a
I've seen ideas like this suggested many times before, and it should be
done. Just needs someone to sit down and write the code :)
At 10:29 AM 6/2/04 -0500, michael wrote:
Since others are in the mood for RFCing, here's something that I was thinking
about implementing for myself and I just wante
Since others are in the mood for RFCing, here's something that I was thinking
about implementing for myself and I just wanted to know how others felt about
it as well.
I was wanting to use Class::DBI to Model my data and H::T to View it. When I
do this I end up with a lot of code that looks like
