On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Scottsweep wrote:
> I'm working from the standpoint of not making associate any more
> complex, actually less so from the end user standpoint.
>From the standpoint of the maintainer it definitely looks more
complex.
> The thought of instantiating another object to do what ca
Sam,
I'm working from the standpoint of not making
associate any more complex, actually less so from the
end user standpoint. If you look at the code all I've
done is added three checks for
($associated_object->can('param') &&
$option{associate_by_methods}), their associated
blocks of code (whic
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Scottsweep wrote:
>I want to propose the following PATCH to
> HTML::Template. This would allow objects to be
> associated without the need to define a param method
> (all public methods can be TMPL_VARs).
This seems like a reasonable thing to want, but I think it would b
Hello all,
I want to propose the following PATCH to
HTML::Template. This would allow objects to be
associated without the need to define a param method
(all public methods can be TMPL_VARs). It adds two
options (see section 2 below) to maintain backwards
compatability with param use. As I unders
