On 5/18/06, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:> Maybe a good option would be to use 'memcached' (Cache::Memcached, which can> also be shared in the distributed environment, and is very easy to manage)
> instead of IPC. What you think?Seems like a f
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:
Maybe a good option would be to use 'memcached' (Cache::Memcached, which can
also be shared in the distributed environment, and is very easy to manage)
instead of IPC. What you think?
Seems like a fun project, if possibly self-defeating. I think
On 5/18/06, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Mathew Robertson wrote:> Shared cache has the nice effect of reducing the memory footprint of the> templates, when running apache in multi-process mode.So does file_cache, and it's a heck of a lot easier to manage!
Maybe a good
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Mathew Robertson wrote:
Shared cache has the nice effect of reducing the memory footprint of the
templates, when running apache in multi-process mode.
So does file_cache, and it's a heck of a lot easier to manage!
-sam
---
You can use a filter to strip stuff from your templates - check the list
archive for examples
Mathew
2) Wouldn't be nice to have a template comment tag?
I think it would be useful to describe template, and not generate
HTML. For example:
or
In our project we 'compile' the templates befo
Shared cache has the nice effect of reducing the memory footprint of the
templates, when running apache in multi-process mode.
Mathew
Yeesh - shared_cache is terrible. I really should remove it. It's
no faster than file_cache and much more prone to problems. Both are
much slower than regula
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:
Are you using caching? Are you pre-caching your templates during
server startup? If so then you can have as many includes as you want
and it won't make a bit of difference at runtime.
Yes, we are using shared_cached. We are no precaching, but
On 5/17/06, Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:> So, some of our pages include 200 templates (we use shared_cached=>1). These> 'include' strategy helps our designer because its HTML code is reutilized
> over and over.> Would you say this is a correc
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:
So, some of our pages include 200 templates (we use shared_cached=>1). These
'include' strategy helps our designer because its HTML code is reutilized
over and over.
Would you say this is a correct approach? What about performace? I know be
need to
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:21:35AM -0300, Matias Alejo Garcia wrote:
>2) Wouldn't be nice to have a template comment tag?
You can get the same effect with:
comments here
Roger
---
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web servi
Hi all!I've been using Template::HTML for 3 months, I would like to ask you a few questions1) In our project we are using around 50 different templates, It is very common for us to do something like:
So, some of our pages include 200 templates (w
11 matches
Mail list logo
