Tellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: martedi 19 marzo 2002 19.41
A: HTML::Template List
Oggetto: Re: [htmltmpl] [cgiapp] Feature Request
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Phil Oertel wrote:
It seems like there are plenty of workarounds, but I can see the
benefits of something like a tmpl_commentblah
Users of CGI::Application / HTML::Template --
Application (CGI even!) development continues to move forward for me. Each
passing day, I love this module more (thanks Jesse!)
I've come across an idea that I thought I would share -- not exactly about
CGI::Application (HTML::Template actually)
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Cory Trese wrote:
Would anyone else find a use for HTML::Template only comments? In
I posted a similar message a while back and the consensus seems to be that
people use TMPL_VARs that never test true:
TMPL_IF some_false_var
My comments here...
/TMPL_IF
--Alex
Would anyone else find a use for HTML::Template only comments?
Yes!
It seems like there are plenty of workarounds, but I can see the benefits of
something like a tmpl_commentblah/tmpl_comment tag. It shouldn't affect
the parsing speed much, and the additional syntax would be minimal.
-phil
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Cory Trese wrote:
Would anyone else find a use for HTML::Template only comments? In
ColdFusion, a secondary form of comments is available for
'developer-eyes-only' that allows somewhat more sensitive data to be stored
in the template files (granted 'more sensitive' is a
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Phil Oertel wrote:
It seems like there are plenty of workarounds, but I can see the
benefits of something like a tmpl_commentblah/tmpl_comment tag. It
this can be handled well by a filter. either remove everything within
tmpl_comment tags, or replace it with tmpl_if
