Re: AW: SSLProtocolSocketFactory

2005-01-04 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 11:54 +0100, Pfingstl Gernot wrote: > >Pfingstl Gernot wrote: > Thank you for the info! > That's exactly what I've done - I made a call Protocol.registerProtocol(..), > but to create a new Protocol(..) you have to implement > SecureProtocolSocketFactory. I wanted to avoid

AW: SSLProtocolSocketFactory

2005-01-04 Thread Pfingstl Gernot
>Pfingstl Gernot wrote: >> The constructor of SSLProtocolSocketFactory is "public", shouldn't it >> be "private"? > >I can't answer this at the moment. > >> In SSLProtocolSocketFactory there is called >> SSLSocketFactory.getDefault() to obtain a SSLSocketFactory. Is there >> a plan to make SSLProto