gt; implementation to the socket factory. It looks like in HC 4.1, this is
>> deprecated. What is the preferred way of customizing host name resolution?
>>
>> I took a look at the source code, and I am guessing I will need to override
>> DefaultClientConnectionOpera
On 14 October 2011 18:58, Matt Solnit wrote:
> Hi everyone. In HC 4.0, the way that a host name is converted to an
> InetAddress object could be overridden by passing a custom HostNameResolver
> implementation to the socket factory. It looks like in HC 4.1, this is
> deprecated.
Hi everyone. In HC 4.0, the way that a host name is converted to an
InetAddress object could be overridden by passing a custom HostNameResolver
implementation to the socket factory. It looks like in HC 4.1, this is
deprecated. What is the preferred way of customizing host name resolution?
I
an
>
> HttpCore 4.1 used by HttpClient 4.1 should be approximately 5% faster
> than HttpCore 4.0. Otherwise, HC 4.0 and HC 4.1 should be pretty much
> equal in terms of performance.
>
> Oleg
>
>
>
t 4.1 should be approximately 5% faster
than HttpCore 4.0. Otherwise, HC 4.0 and HC 4.1 should be pretty much
equal in terms of performance.
Oleg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: httpclient-users-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org
For addition
Hello Oleg,
Im using HttpClient4.0.3. In terms of performance, is there any gain using
HttpClient 4.1. vs 4.0.3?
Thanks,
Joan.
natarajan_va...@emc.com wrote:
When is HttpClient 4.1 GA release planned?
Provided everything goes well, 4.1-alpha1 should be released before the
end of the year. There is presently no time line for the 4.1 GA release
I could commit myself to. All new features planned for 4.1 are basically
When is HttpClient 4.1 GA release planned?
