Public bug reported: The more detailed summary: running geometric optimizer after stitcher, but on the same input data produces drastically different result.
The testcase uses the same input data as in bug #1856336. The system is the same and the instructions to download input data are the same. Input data and evidence can be found under https://cloud.mail.ru/public/NN3V/2x8jVAS9n . As in bug #1856336 the 8 input .NEF files were imported the usual way through the "Photos" window - see 'photos_window.png' file in the above web folder. Then control points were detected automatically - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details. Then geometric optimizer was run - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details. The optimizer produced a report - see 'first_optimizer_report.png' file in the above web folder. In the report one can see, for example, "maximum: 7.041825". Then photometric optimizer was then run. Then "Stitcher" tab was clicked and stitcher parameters were set - see 'stitcher_window.png' file in the above web folder for details. In the stitcher window "Calculate Field of View" and "Calculate Optimal Size" were clicked. When stitcher finished its run again "Photos" tab was clicked and in it geometric optimizer was run again (by clicking its "Calculate" button). The second run produced a different from the first run result - see 'second_optimizer_report.png' file in the above web folder for details. In the report one can see among other things "maximum: 84.440525". I.e. the second report maximum is more than order of magnitude bigger than the first one. IMO consecutive run of a program on the same input data should produce the same output data - unless there is randomization. ** Affects: hugin Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1856345 Title: Running geometric optimizer after stitcher producing drastically different result Status in Hugin: New Bug description: The more detailed summary: running geometric optimizer after stitcher, but on the same input data produces drastically different result. The testcase uses the same input data as in bug #1856336. The system is the same and the instructions to download input data are the same. Input data and evidence can be found under https://cloud.mail.ru/public/NN3V/2x8jVAS9n . As in bug #1856336 the 8 input .NEF files were imported the usual way through the "Photos" window - see 'photos_window.png' file in the above web folder. Then control points were detected automatically - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details. Then geometric optimizer was run - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details. The optimizer produced a report - see 'first_optimizer_report.png' file in the above web folder. In the report one can see, for example, "maximum: 7.041825". Then photometric optimizer was then run. Then "Stitcher" tab was clicked and stitcher parameters were set - see 'stitcher_window.png' file in the above web folder for details. In the stitcher window "Calculate Field of View" and "Calculate Optimal Size" were clicked. When stitcher finished its run again "Photos" tab was clicked and in it geometric optimizer was run again (by clicking its "Calculate" button). The second run produced a different from the first run result - see 'second_optimizer_report.png' file in the above web folder for details. In the report one can see among other things "maximum: 84.440525". I.e. the second report maximum is more than order of magnitude bigger than the first one. IMO consecutive run of a program on the same input data should produce the same output data - unless there is randomization. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1856345/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs Post to : hugin-devs@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp