[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-12-17 Thread tmodes
@Brent The status was changed to 'Invalid' only in the Hugin bug tracker (because this can't fixed in Hugin). The ticket is still open in enblend bug tracker. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend. https://bugs.launchpa

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-31 Thread Brent Townshend
Why was this changed to 'Invalid'? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880605 Title: enblend mask optimization failures Status in Enblend: New Status in Hugin - Panorama Tools GUI

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-31 Thread tmodes
** Changed in: hugin Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880605 Title: enblend mask optimization failures Status in Enblend: New Status in Hugin - Pa

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-30 Thread Mikolaj Leszczynski
You are correct about the loops. They are caused by the seam line optimizers, as confirmed by Christoph Spiel. The optimizers require fixes to cope with the new algorithm in some cases. As a temporary workaround, one can use a fine mask or the old primary seam generator, which is better compatible

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-23 Thread Brent Townshend
The failure occurs with or without the --wrap=both or --wrap=none. But it still appears related to the image overlaps crossing around the panorama boundary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend. https://bugs.launchpad

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-23 Thread Brent Townshend
I think this may be related to the --wrap=both option to enblend. One of the images in this particular blending had part of its extent wrapped around the edges of the image file. I think that's whats causing enblend to think there are more seams and coming up with the bad result. By the way, t

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-23 Thread Brent Townshend
I'm also uploading enblends verbose output. It looks like for this image pair, it thinks there are 5 seams to optimize rather than just 2 as there should be. ** Attachment added: "enblend.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/880605/+attachment/2568994/+files/enblend.log ** Project ch

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 880605] Re: enblend mask optimization failures

2011-10-23 Thread Brent Townshend
** Attachment added: "vis-2.tif" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880605/+attachment/2568992/+files/vis-2.tif -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880605 Title: enblend mask optimizat