Thank you everyone. I figured these things out. Looks like I can migrate
my workflow to mac, at last.
Regards
JohnQ
Erik Krause wrote:
> paul womack wrote:
>
>
>> Hugin (actually nona, which hugin drives) is richly configurable
>> for interpolation alogorithm, from nearest neighbour to Sinc10
paul womack wrote:
>
> Hugin (actually nona, which hugin drives) is richly configurable
> for interpolation alogorithm, from nearest neighbour to Sinc1024
... which are quite good as long as it doesn't come to downsampling.
Always output at suggested maximum size and downsize in your image edi
On Wed 17-Dec-2008 at 15:01 -0800, Mötzli wrote:
>So between the stacks, I only created control points for one exposure
>value (+2EV in my case), but I didn't create control points for the 0
>EV and the -2EV. This is correct, is it?
That should be ok, though you do need to create control points
I found that jpgs reduced the file swapping load. Also, on a box with two
HD's you can offload file swapping (vram) to one drive and this leaves the
silicon free for processing load.
Indeed, you want to optimize with the smaller files. One tip is to just
change the file names/paths in the pto wh
I think what breic means is downsizing in resolution, not merely jpeg
file compression. Although jpeg images will load faster than tiffs due
to their file size, they use the same amount of memory when loaded and
will slow down CP finding, CP manipulation and preview displaying.
Since Hugin and th
Hi Mötzli
I always feel it takes to much fidling to do everything in one go in hugin.
I shoot 27 images for a 360 panorama, and I always have to spend at
least half an hour cleaning up control points or putting them in
manually. If I put 4*27 images in hugin I'm busy all day :)
I make my panorama
Forgot to add, jpeg to a lower resolution for the mapping images, but keep
the image dimensions the same.
-Original Message-
From: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com [mailto:hugin-...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of breic
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 11:21 PM
To: hugin and other free panoram
Yes, I did this same thing to produce some HDR panoramas. Map with the low
resolution images, then when you want to stitch, swap them out with hi res
versions of the same image, using the same names. Hugin won't know the
difference.
The second pano down, Lyman, on this page was done that way.
ht
my_daily_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> I just started to use Hugin, but have an experience with PTAssembler.
> What I noticed is that Hugin creates panoramas much faster then
> PTAssembler. PTAssembler has a choice of different interpolation
> algorithms, which can be useful for the first trial stitc
I just started to use Hugin, but have an experience with PTAssembler.
What I noticed is that Hugin creates panoramas much faster then
PTAssembler. PTAssembler has a choice of different interpolation
algorithms, which can be useful for the first trial stitch and strongest
for final version. Does
10 matches
Mail list logo
