[hugin-ptx] GSoC 2009 accepted students

Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI Linux crash

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 17:59 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: >> how about releasing 0.8.0 without PTBatcher and solving these >> issues later? > > This is what I'd like to do, but I have no idea how close it is to > being releasable do it. if it is close, then we'll have a close

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 released

A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok for a 'stable' release? Who is using it? Is it in the any of the current hugin binary snapshot bundles? -- Bruno On Tue 03-Mar-2009 at 23:28 +, Brun

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI Linux crash

On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 17:59 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >how about releasing 0.8.0 without PTBatcher and solving these >issues later? This is what I'd like to do, but I have no idea how close it is to being releasable - Somebody was saying a few days ago that they found it quite useful on Windo

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI Linux crash

Bruno Postle wrote: > PTBatcherGUI starts but isn't functional, the stitching queue isn't > loaded on startup, projects can be added to the queue, but they fail > when run (possibly a different bug). how about releasing 0.8.0 without PTBatcher and solving these issues later? the difference bet

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI Linux crash

On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 21:23 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > > Ok, I can rearrange the order of these commits: svn 3736 is the > commit that broke things. The attached patch for the trunk hacks out the lines that cause the crash. PTBatcherGUI starts but isn't functional, the stitching queue isn't

[hugin-ptx] GSoC 2009 accepted student announced

Hi all, Google has announced the students accepted for GSoC 2009 [0]. I have taken the time to write a feedback to all students that have applied for Hugin and whose application has been rejected. Congratulations to those who are going to work on Hugin through the summer. Please understand th

[hugin-ptx] Satyajeet Singh

If Satyajeet Singh is still on this mailing list and wants to get some feedback as to why his application for GSoC with us has been rejected, please contact me off-list (I don't have an email address for him). Thank you Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received thi

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI Linux crash (was:PTBatcherGUI single instance)

On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 21:14 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > > I've narrowed down the date when PTBatcherGUI broke on Linux to the 15th > March: > >svn 3734 builds, runs without crashing >svn 3735 doesn't build >svn 3736 doesn't build >svn 3737 doesn't build >svn 3738 builds, cras

[hugin-ptx] PTBatcherGUI Linux crash (was:PTBatcherGUI single instance)

On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 21:03 +0200, Seb Perez-D wrote: > >I come very late to this thread, since I had never used PTBatcherGUI - >except today, when I tried to run it and found that it crashed a few >instants after being started, in linux. The error is: >PTBatcherGUI: ../../src/xcb_io.c:285: _XAllo

[hugin-ptx] Re: PTBatcherGUI single instance

I come very late to this thread, since I had never used PTBatcherGUI - except today, when I tried to run it and found that it crashed a few instants after being started, in linux. The error is: PTBatcherGUI: ../../src/xcb_io.c:285: _XAllocID: Assertion `!(dpy->flags & (1L << 3))' failed. I am usi

[hugin-ptx] Re: Big hugin project.

On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:27 -0700, r.e.wolff wrote: > > > On Apr 20, 6:22 pm, "Bart.van.Andel" wrote: > > My first thought about images rendered black was that somehow you are > > (well, Hugin is) using a wrong value for the EV. Normally you can > > tweak the EV value (in the preview window, fo

[hugin-ptx] Re: Big hugin project.

On 20 apr, 18:27, "r.e.wolff" wrote: > On Apr 20, 6:22 pm, "Bart.van.Andel" wrote: > > > My first thought about images rendered black was that somehow you are > > (well, Hugin is) using a wrong value for the EV. Normally you can > > tweak the EV value (in the preview window, for instance) to a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Big hugin project.

On Apr 20, 6:22 pm, "Bart.van.Andel" wrote: > My first thought about images rendered black was that somehow you are > (well, Hugin is) using a wrong value for the EV. Normally you can > tweak the EV value (in the preview window, for instance) to alter the > brightness of the image. If the EV is

[hugin-ptx] Re: Big hugin project.

My first thought about images rendered black was that somehow you are (well, Hugin is) using a wrong value for the EV. Normally you can tweak the EV value (in the preview window, for instance) to alter the brightness of the image. If the EV is set to a very low value, the image will be rendered co

[hugin-ptx] Big hugin project.

I've shot about 130 images yesterday, and I was planning on creating one big pano from this I've shot 18 images at 18mm focal length providing a nice 360 degree view of "everything", and then I shot over 100 more images at 135mm focal length just of the interesting part. The final image is g

[hugin-ptx] Re: Command-line panorama making a "Linear" pano

On Apr 17, 3:46 pm, Oskar Sander wrote: > The second question I have is if absolute HVFO is at all relevant or > if I can set it to one arbitrary small number in this case.   I tried this a while ago. It turns out that the FOV parameter on the stitch tab is an integer. This is annoying if you

[hugin-ptx] Re: Visualize imageGraph of a project?

On Apr 19, 12:53 pm, Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 17-Apr-2009 at 22:33 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote: > You can use ptograph to visualise the project as an undirected > graph, but it isn't very useful for spherical panoramas: I built a different tool last week, that will make a postscript plot of

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

Rehi! > Do you mean that I should remove that "fix" or change it somehow? You can remove AC_FUNC_MALLOC from configure.in and ditch your "fix". I removed it from "staging" in rev314. > > While we are at it: can somebody tell me whether > > I better remove AC_FUNC_MALLOC from > > "conf

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

On Mon 20-Apr-2009 at 14:05 +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > >So when you simply want to paste the images together feathering the >transition is great, but if you want enblend to feather it for you, >you simply shouldn't use gradual alpha masks. > >But the bug remains: Enblend should either refuse to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:29:59AM -0700, grow wrote: > > Harry, Bruno, > > I have now experimented a bit more with this stitch. > Using the preview panel I removed various images and exposure-stack > image-triples in turn and re-ran the stitch over and over ... It kept > crashing at what looks

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

Harry, Bruno, I tried including the images that had had "grey" Alpha masks but with their Alpha Channels deleted. the stitch ran to successful completion. I have now tried adding a simple black Alpha Channel to each of those images and it crashes again. So much for my "grey theory"! all the b

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

Harry, Bruno, I have now experimented a bit more with this stitch. Using the preview panel I removed various images and exposure-stack image-triples in turn and re-ran the stitch over and over ... It kept crashing at what looks like the same place UNTIL I removed a particular triple of images.

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin 0.80 beta for windows

I have one same problem. When I use fast preview button most of time it shows only first picture. When I allign pictures with old preview button it shows whole pictures and when i click back on fast preview button it shows all pictures. On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 6:24 PM, wrote: > > Hello, > > D

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

2009/4/20 cspiel > > Harry - > > > This same error was reported on Newyears day by "nobody" > (hugin-Bugs-2480029). > > Despite my request for more info we didn't get it. > >From the study of the ticket I conclude > you are talking about a problem with Enblend not > with Hugin. Right? >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Alpha Channel Masking

Harry - > This same error was reported on Newyears day by "nobody" (hugin-Bugs-2480029). > Despite my request for more info we didn't get it. From the study of the ticket I conclude you are talking about a problem with Enblend not with Hugin. Right? > I know there are some "irregulari