On Nov 20, 4:13 am, Seb Perez-D wrote:
>
> > That being said, the gimp solution is not so nice for positive
> > masking. Then again, neither is the inkscape approach. In both cases,
> > we basically have to erase the desired area from all pano layers
> > except the current one. That's a lot of bor
Hey all,
I've produced the first pano I am really happy with, and I'm loving
hugin more and more everyday!
So I'd like to say a big "Thank you" to all developers for making such
a fantastic tool, and for making me have so much fun with it; you guys
rock!
Cheers!
Tim.
PS: the pano in question:
h
On Thu 19-Nov-2009 at 23:58 +0100, Eduardo Pérez wrote:
>Attached is the Spanish translation; I did not find any mistakes at the
>original, by the way.
Thanks, I've added it to the site.
--
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other fre
Attached is the Spanish translation; I did not find any mistakes at the
original, by the way.
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:14 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
> Hi all, there are some initial release notes for 2009.4.0 here:
>
> http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/
> http://hugin.svn.sourceforge.net/vie
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 18:52, Timothee wrote:
>
> That being said, the gimp solution is not so nice for positive
> masking. Then again, neither is the inkscape approach. In both cases,
> we basically have to erase the desired area from all pano layers
> except the current one. That's a lot of bor
Hi Seb,
Thanks for your answer!
On Nov 16, 4:49 pm, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:16, Timothee wrote:
> > I'm trying to do a 360 pano with my kids for xmas and they just won't
> > stay still, so I definitely will have to do some level of masking.
>
> You can also edit the TIF
