Hi all!
Everybody who thinks, he missed out on
release candidate 1 (RC1), please put your mind
at rest. We did not announce RC1 in public.
Self-Destruction Computer: Ten, nine, eight, six
President Skroob: Six? What happened to seven?
Self-Destruction Computer: Just kidding!
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 18:28, wb wrote:
>> Done: dumont.pto and (.mk). This is just after the "Load images..."
>> step. If you mean after an additional optimization, I can add that.
>
> You have three wrong control points between images 0 and 3. They a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 18:28, wb wrote:
> Done: dumont.pto and (.mk). This is just after the "Load images..."
> step. If you mean after an additional optimization, I can add that.
You have three wrong control points between images 0 and 3. They are
throwing everything off. Delete them and reop
On Nov 25, 9:52 am, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 17:46, Warren Block wrote:
> > The control points appear to be fine. It's the position of the images
> > that is completely wrong.
>
> Thanks for the images!
>
> It would help if you posted the pto file just after optimisation.
Do
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 17:46, Warren Block wrote:
> The control points appear to be fine. It's the position of the images
> that is completely wrong.
Thanks for the images!
It would help if you posted the pto file just after optimisation.
Best,
Seb
--
You received this message because you
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Seb Perez-D wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 20:49, wb wrote:
>> autopano-sift and autopano-sift-C have problems with a panorama of six
>> 4000x3000 images. Images end up upside down or twisted, and not
>> related to each other at all. panomatic has no trouble with the same
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 20:49, wb wrote:
> autopano-sift and autopano-sift-C have problems with a panorama of six
> 4000x3000 images. Images end up upside down or twisted, and not
> related to each other at all. panomatic has no trouble with the same
> images.
Is the problem that you cannot fin
